Tuesday, September 6, 2011

New Law To Crack Down On Arguing While Intoxicated

Now that September 1 has finally come and gone, several new laws that passed during the recent legislative session are now in effect.  Perhaps the most interesting law passed is the one that makes it a Class A Misdemeanor to have an argument while one is legally intoxicated.
What, you haven’t heard about this law yet?  Well, you just haven’t been paying attention.  It has been the subject of a great deal of debate, but the debate will no longer be permitted to take place over a pitcher of cerveza.  Well, maybe one pitcher is okay for the debate, but two is really pushing things…
Ok, I am just kidding.  There is no new law in Texas that makes it a crime to argue while intoxicated. However, sometimes it seems like it wouldn’t be such a crazy idea.  Lots of the more serious stuff that is considered serious criminal behavior takes place once you get the ethanol and testosterone cocktail flowing through the brain.  The “guns are a good thing” crowd hasn’t quite figured out how to spin this unpleasant fact of life just yet.  Yes, drunk people probably do have lousy aim, but from 5 or 10 feet your aim isn’t usually a big concern.
Last time I checked, there are over 2,000 different felonies under Texas law.    Every two years there are a few more added to the list.  If you are drunk, or high on some of the more, umm, anxiety and paranoia inducing drugs, your odds of committing one of the 2000+ felonies increase dramatically, especially if you are male.
I can’t remember the last time a felony was de-criminalized.  You’d think something, anything, would become less of a big deal over time and become a non-crime. Okay, maybe sodomy makes the short list here, but…
With so many crimes on the books that can be committed even while being stone sober, just imagine how easy it becomes once a person is 3 sheets to the wind or after 2 days of meth or crack induced sleep deprivation.
I really like the old fashioned police practice of hauling the drunks off to the drunk tank and simply letting them go with a small fine and some aspirin once they’ve sobered up.  At least a public intoxication charge is as far as it would get in such situations.
If we made “arguing while intoxicated”, or “AWI” a crime, we could also have MADA”  or Mothers Against Drunk Arguing.  After a while, MADA could get organized and they could get the crime turned into a felony by showing everybody pictures of all the people who got killed or injured following the stuff that happens when drunk people argue.  Those pictures would be pretty gruesome at times.
Although this post may seem silly, I do think that substance abuse tends to mix very poorly with arguments, especially when men are the ones abusing the substances.  I’m not sure what the solution is to this serious issue, but since putting people in prison seems to be such a popular solution (that, by the way, rarely succeeds), I’m not sure that having another new crime, AWI,  would do much good.  It is possible that such a law would prevent or reduce the possibility of more serious crimes  taking place.  Of course, it would also give legislators more “tough on crime” stuff to brag about.  They like having that.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Parole Commissioner Edgar Morales To Retire

Edgar Morales, Parole Commissioner in the San Antonio Board Office of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, is leaving his position.  He has been a Parole Commissioner for approximately 5 years.  Yesterday was his last official day on the job.
Morales, a former U.S. Marshal, Chief of Police, and U.S. Army Special Forces veteran, also holds a Master’s Degree in business administration.  He will be greatly missed by the Board.  According to reliable information, Morales is an extremely qualified, dedicated, and hard working Parole Commissioner who is liked by everyone in the Board office where he has worked during the past five years.
Although I wasn’t always happy with his voting decisions, I respected the difficult job Mr. Morales had to perform.  I personally found him to be diligent, open, honest, and willing to look at things from different perspectives.   Although he has a stern and serious demeanor, he also has a sense of humor and is sensitive to the human consequences of crime and incarceration.
If history is any guide, it will take at least 6 weeks, maybe 8, before a replacement will be hired and will be in a position to vote cases. This delay poses several interesting questions.
First, will having just 2 voters in the San Antonio Board Office mean that there will be a voting delay for offenders incarcerated in the prisons that are voted out of the San Antonio region?
Second, how can the two remaining voters, Board Memeber Juanita Gonzalez and Parole Commissioner Charles Speier, ever really disagree on a vote in the meantime?  In other words, if the 2 remaining voters should wish to disagree on a parole vote, will they disagree?  If they do, who will break the tie until the new Parole Commissioner is on board?
Finally, in the time it takes to fill Morales’ newly vacated position, is it fair to assume that the parole reviews will be even more hurried and superficial than the unacceptable statewide status quo? I have often said that despite the very best efforts of the Parole Board Members and Parole Commissioners, the amount of time dedicated to the consideration of Offenders for parole is shockingly low.  This is really an inevitable consequence of the way the system is set up and funded, not because of anything the voters can do to change it.
As Edgar Morales begins the next chapter in a life and career that has exemplified public service and hard work, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles has some very big shoes to fill.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Parole Board Member Charles Aycock Retires, Governor Appoints Replacement

I’m sure Charles Aycock has a lot more free time than he did a month ago.  I learned about a week ago that he retired and his replacement on the Board of Pardons and Paroles has already been appointed.
I will miss Mr. Aycock.  Not because he always voted the way I wanted him to, he didn’t.  I will miss him because it was obvious to me that he cared very deeply about his duties, and he was genuinely interested in hearing and understanding the information that I provided to him about my clients.  He wanted to make sure he knew as much as possible about theperson who committed the crime, as well as the crime itself.  To me, that says an awful lot about Mr. Aycock’s integrity, professionalism, and that he really understood the important role of the Parole Board in the criminal justice system.
Charles Aycock was appointed to the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles in March, 2004.  I also recall that Mr. Aycock was the President of the State Bar of Texas back around 1998, when I was a newly licensed attorney.  When I met him in connection with his role as a Parole Board Member, I was pleasantly surprised at how humble and friendly was.
I hope that Mr. Aycock enjoys the next chapter in a life that has already been filled with many honors and distinctions.  I, for one, am sad to see Charles Aycock leave the Parole Board.

Monday, July 11, 2011

When The System Doesn’t Work

I am currently representing a man, a really good man, who is sitting in a Texas prison. He’s been there for a couple of years now.  I’m trying to make sure that he receives a favorable parole decision from the TDCJ Board of Pardons and Paroles, at the earliest possible date.
If my efforts are successful, I will feel really, really good about it. However, the wrong that has already been done to him will always follow him.  His story demonstrates the  danger of prosecutorial abuse of power in our criminal justice system, and the dangers of selecting an unethical criminal defense lawyer.
I’ll call my client “Al”.  Although Al is incarcerated, it is my humble belief that the prosecutor and the defense lawyers who were responsible for making sure that Al is now in prison are much more deserving of prison.
The improper prosecution of Al took place right here in San Antonio, Texas, a few years ago.
If you are one of those people who thinks that prison only happens to other people, other “bad” people, you really ought to read the story of how Al ended up becoming a convicted felon, who is now living as a prisoner in one of TDCJ’s 120 prisons.  Moreover, if you’re one of those people who thinks the prosecutor always wears the white hat, and the defense lawyer wears the black one, you really need to keep reading.  There weren’t many white hats to be found in Al’s criminal prosecution.
Al is in his late forties.  Until a few years ago, he’d never been arrested or convicted of any crime, ever.  He also swears that he’s never used any illegal drugs.  When he was younger, Al served our country by being an active duty member of  the United States Army.  He joined after he graduated from high school.
As a Staff Sargeant, Al was deployed to Kuwait/Iraq, twice.  After more than 20 years of dedicated service, and plenty of sacrifice, Al left the Army.  He didn’t really want to leave, but he had developed some problems as a result of some of the things he had experienced in combat, and he’d reached the point where it just made better financial sense for him to retire from the military.  He was honorably discharged, and he left the military diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD.
Al’s PTSD has nothing to do with why he is in prison.  Instead, Al’s love, his honor, and his sense of loyalty is really to blame.  Oh, and the prosecutor, who I hope and pray is no longer a prosecutor.
I mention the PTSD only because Al’s PTSD is pretty severe, and the VA provided counseling and medical treatment for Al’s PTSD prior to Al being incarcerated.  As you might guess, Al isn’t getting any treatment for his PTSD in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, even though they have a copy of his medical records from the VA, and Al has asked for help, particularly the medications he used to be prescribed so that he could sleep.  But that’s not the point of this story.  Perhaps a future blog post will highlight the, umm, excellent medical care given to Texas prison inmates.  Anyway, back to Al’s sad story.
After he left the military, Al settled in San Antonio.  Eventually, he met a woman and married her.   She had 3 sons, and an ex-husband who didn’t really embrace the concept of paying child support to one’s ex spouse.  The older two boys were already teens when Al came into their lives, and the youngest boy was in elementary school.
Al did his best to help raise the boys.  He bought a house with as many bedrooms as he could afford using his VA loan eligibility, and he used his paychecks to support his wife and 3 step children.  But, as Al describes the situation, the older boys were pretty much delinquents by the time he entered their lives.  Whenever he’d try to instill a sense of morals, or pride, or discipline, the older ones disregarded or mocked their step father and thoroughly defied him on a regular basis.
Needless to say, the bond Al developed with the older boys was not particularly strong.  He had to be content with being a father figure and a positive role model to the youngest boy, who seemed much more malleable.  He grew to love the boy, even as his relationship with the other two boys grew worse and worse.
When the oldest boy moved out of the house, Al’s house, Al admits that he was actually somewhat relieved.  The pretty criminal behavior and the rotten attitude of the older 2 boys had been a constant source of friction between Al and his wife.  According to Al, she was one of those mothers who never seemed to think her kid did anything wrong.  You know the ones I’m talking about.  It’s always someone else’s fault that their son is in trouble or is screwing up his life.
I call those moms enablers.  There are quite a few guys in prison who have moms like that, which is yet another interesting topic for a future blog posting.  Anyway, back to Al.
Al was hoping that, with delinquent #1 out, and the upcoming departure of delinquent #2 from the house, there just might be hope for a restored  sense of peace in Al’s home, and his strained marriage.
THE CRIME THAT LANDED AL IN A TEXAS PRISON
On Al’s wedding anniversary, he had made a reservation at a really nice restaurant and he’d bought his wife flowers.  He couldn’t wait for her to get home from work so that they could have a special night together.  They had a rocky marriage, and Al was really trying to get their marriage to a better and happier place.
In the late afternoon on the day of Al’s date with his wife, Al was playing a video game with the youngest boy, who was now 13.  All of a sudden, the oldest boy unlocked the front door with the key he wasn’t supposed to have, ran into the house, went straight upstairs, and closed the bedroom door in the room in which he used to live.
Al thought this was very strange.  There was no good reason for the unexpected visit by the oldest boy, and his behavior just seemed suspicious.  Within a couple of minutes after Al’s step son arrived at the house, he was gone again.  Out the door, into his car, then vrrrroooom, away he drove.  Not even a “Hi” or “Bye”.
Al went upstairs, opened the door to the room, and looked carefully at the room.  He noticed that the closet door was open, and he peeked inside.  There was a trash bag with some dirty clothes.  Al was pretty sure that the bag was not there earlier.
He inspected the bag of dirty clothes and found a bag of cocaine inside.  It wasn’t a small bag either.  Al was really angry, but he didn’t know exactly what to do about the situation.  However, he knew that he wanted to wait until the next day to show his wife what he had found and to confront his step son at that time.  After all, it was their anniversary, and he did have a special evening planned.  Why ruin it over yet another instance of the step son’s improper delinquent behaviors?
Al reasoned that his wife was in so much denial about her eldest son that he needed to show her the evidence rather than simply allege that he’d found drugs.  He also feared that if he flushed the drugs down the toilet, his step son might be at risk of being hurt or killed if whoever gave him the drugs had done so on credit.  So, he took the bag of cocaine out of the step son’s former bedroom, and placed it in the top drawer of his own dresser, under some socks.
His wife came home soon thereafter, and the couple soon went out to the nice restaurant for their anniversary dinner. Unfortunately, they never even got to enjoy their meal.  As they were waiting for the food to arrive at their table, Al’s mobile phone rang.  It was the police calling, telling Al that he needed to get home immediately.
When Al and his wife arrived, the police had all 3 of Al’s step sons handcuffed, laying face down on the living room floor.  His front door was broken off the hinges.  The police battering ram was on Al’s front porch, and there were cops everywhere.  The police were already executing a search warrant of the premises.  Al asked why they had a search warrant, and the police officer told him that they had strong evidence that Al’s stepson was selling drugs, that they’d been following him, and that they believed he was using Al’s house to store his drugs.
A little while later, the bag of cocaine was found.  Of course, the delinquent stepson denied any knowledge of the drugs.  He then invoked his constitutional right to remain silent  Al decided to remain silent also, since he didn’t want to get the son into any more trouble than he already was in.  So, the police decided to arrest the stepson AND Al.  The police detective told Al’s wife that she was lucky that they didn’t arrest her too.
Al’s wife hired a lawyer, but she couldn’t afford two lawyers.  Despite a blatantly obvious conflict of interest, the lawyer went forward representing Al and the stepson.  Al told the lawyer everything about the stepson being the owner of the drugs, and the lawyer knew that the police got the search warrant because of the stepson in the first place, which supports Al’s claims 100%.
After months of “work”, the lawyer advised Al that he should plead guilty and that the Judge would give him probation.  Al’s wife,  soon to be his “ex-wife” begged him not to say anything to the Judge about the stepson being the true owner of the drugs.
The lawyer hired by Al’s wife got his “friend”, another lawyer, to go to court and get Al his probation plea agreement.  Al didn’t understand why a different lawyer went in to get him probation, but he was mad at both of them.
Al felt, rightly so, that the prosecutor ought to drop the charges against him, and that the prosecutor and the police had plenty of evidence about who was really responsible for the drugs being in the house.  He also asked his lawyer why the prosecutor wasn’t interested in the truth.  He was told that he was NOT to speak to the Judge or the prosecutor, lest he make his situation worse.
Unfortunately, the prosecutor was hung up on the fact that the drugs were found in Al’s dresser, rather than on how the drugs got into the house or even who the suspected criminal was in the first place.
The lawyer scared Al into taking a plea deal, allegedly a plea deal for probation.  He told Al that if he went to trial and lost, he’d likely get much worse than probation.  Al was scared, angry, and he reluctantly trusted in his lawyer’s advice and counsel.  Big mistake.
The plea deal that was supposed to be for probation was signed by Al, but much to his shock, horror, disgust, etc., the Judge refused to give probation, based on the amount of the stepson’s drugs.  Al was told he could not withdraw his plea, and the Judge sentenced him to 4 years in TDCJ.
The Judge angrily said that nobody gets probation for having that much cocaine in their house.  Hmmm, I sure hope the Judge doesn’t have a step son like Al had.
Meanwhile, the prosecutor, scalp in hand, dismissed the charges against Al’s stepson.  Wow.  All the police work, the search warrant, all of it, was based on a 19 year old delinquent selling drugs. Yet, all that really mattered in the end to the prosecutor (and the judge?)was that someone conveniently paid the price for the existence of drugs in Al’s house.
In the end, the 19 year old walked away without any penalty whatsoever.  The stepfather, a decorated U.S. Army veteran with no history of criminal behavior, ever, went up the river, and the defense lawyers moved on to the next case.
Al is understandably distrustful of lawyers, judges, and cops.  He served his country honorably, and Al always tried to be the best husband and father figure he could be.  Now, he simply tries to be the model inmate.
What a sad and unfortunate story!